|
bluetsunami (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That 1 lens is a Super Telephoto lens! Its made for Professional Photography but sometimes us hobbyist can't help ourselves ;_;
raimundo27 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The Canon Lens 100-400 EF f/4.5-5.6L IS USM together is the perfect combination for me - a novice sports photographer.I can buy the two for under Aus$3000 and get great sports action shots.
ryanracca (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You should see the largest lens of Sigmaman, they're expensive as hell
scaredweepel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
in pounds it'll be £1700 or even cheaper! But that's a lot of money to be spend on photos of electric pylons.
xelaeel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
huh .... 100-400mm + 40D does not equal to 7000! it's 4000 at most! the cheapest price for the combo is 3000 ... and once u'r into photography ... u drool for lenses !
prisonbreakmegafan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
cause you're not a photo-freak like me :)
navymmw (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol, I know. You could get your PPL for that price!
QuicksilverRZ (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i dont see how someone can drop over $7,000 for a camera and 1 lens. insane
dodd9999 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
True. To be honest it did not occur to me. I'd only had the camera for about 10 days so it wasn't a natural thought to use LV. The advantage with the view through the viewfinder is that you can see the speed of the AF. All you'd get with LV is a black screen while AF was finding the target. If the lens was hunting or struggling you would never see that with LV.
BONDzer007 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you know u could have used live view |