|
bustbool (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
what imagination? wasnt it based on a book someone else wrote?
mimosveta (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think he is right in what his saying, but wrong for saying it. He should not try to explain anything to anyone, for those who can, will understand anyway. Those who can't, or won't, will only use explanation to round their collection of misunderstandings.
sneezuschrist (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I love how everyone magically has balls on the internet. people getting up in arms about movie opinions just makes me lololol..
samoator (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
GOOD MOVIE!!!!!
jeremydean (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Love ya Terry, but the movie should SHOW us how to view the events through the eyes of a child instead of you TELLing us. If you ask me it failed in that respect (although it was disturbing and interesting) because it was too hard to identify with her. A plotless film CAN be fascinating - but this one just dragged.
daveismyreligion (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Love love love Tideland and Gilliam!
bustbool (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i dont see lovely there
bustbool (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
um she was trying to seduce a mentally ill guy and shes 8 or something
bustbool (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
u again? shut up cuntface ur as delusional as that little girl
bustbool (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ur the 1 that started it. the other lady said she didnt like the movie, not that she didnt like u. i cant take dumb art film knowitall bitches like u. and u r a pedo if u find anything lovely about a little makking out with a mentally ill crazy man sporting dinamite. have fun takeing the virginity of sick people and talking to squirrels idiot. rot in hell u disgusting cunt |