BitchErica1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

she has no life.

deanriam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Look, I'm not gonna go step by step with you on what I posted just because you can't read, I already answered the same question to someone else.

ankatz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

so anytime an actors play someone else, whichc happens all the time, they are not deserving of recognition?

ankatz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

you are extremely naive if you think makeup constitutes acting. this was one of the best performances in cinematic history, critics praised her ebert said so. and charlize got another nomination two years later. christina hasent gotten any. christina just had to work off charlize's intensity. it was easy.

allena22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

this is the oscars i think 2003

TENCI08 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

wat year iz diz academy awards

robertodemente (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Charlize performance looked good because Christina Ricci's performance was simply perfection. She made the movie looked and feel realistic, not just a pretty girl with face prosthetics. She was just perfect and people didnt even cared. This was Christina Ricci's movie

allena22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i agree go charlize!

Flamingrivers (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

HA! Diane Keaton had her Annie Hall outfit on! :)

LickMyCuntMoFo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I agree, she argueably is the best out of them all.