elvishitler (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i love keefs hummingbird!

rickystoned (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

the beatles were the best until 1963. maybe.

rufusandburne (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

no 1 gets what they want all the time & if you try ok you might get food & a warm place to live but thats no enough the stones know that so a crap song really! stones are ok though

ChronicFrybag (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

it is depressing but the only reason i do not have a girlfriend is because im stuck out in a small town called raymond its full of god damn fucking mormans thats why i smoke weed and i smoke alot

frazer1ho (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

smoke less weed, very few girls are attracted to stoners. the reason i wrote this is because your comment was so depressing so... thats my honest advice (assumed youre a pothead based on your screen name).

skrfrk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

noDave Grohl doesn't deserve to be in that list under any circumstances. Maybe if it were Nirvana but thats a definite maybe.

SignusMelko (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The Beatles were the first, I don't think I'd call them the best though. Just my opinion. Rolling Stones are definitely up there, pioneers, just like The Who and Queen

Arsher (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I'd say the Stones are in the 10 best bands ever, obviously not at the 1rst place . The Beatles were the best of the bests of the bests of the bests .

tjoudega (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i must disagree.They are good and have nice songs, but they are not better than the beatles, so not the best rock n roll band ever

Master4999 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Look how long Charlie's hair is!!!....Lol, great!